Blog

Wasteful Ineffective Advertising vs. Highly Effective Advertising

Stop Spending So Much On Ineffective Advertising

Advertising known as institutional advertising is the practice of running ads that are designed to keep your business name in front of the public.

Institutional ads are ineffectual, non-trackable, and a blatant waste of your resources. These types of ads are so ineffectual that they’ll accomplish nothing more than drain your advertising budget.

I try to get my clients to understand this logical fact: Advertising is salesmanship. It’s either salesmanship in print, salesmanship on the web, salesmanship on the air, or salesmanship in the mail. It’s not blind, nebulous, or non stimulating statements that say nothing, make no case, or compel no one to action.

But few, if any, business owners truly or properly understand the very purpose or reason for running an ad.

The purpose of an ad is to stimulate a direct and immediate response — either a qualified inquiry, phone call, visit to your website or visit to your location — or better yet, to promote an instant sell. Nothing else justifies spending the lavish monies ads cost.

How do you tell the difference between an institutional ad and a direct-response ad? Very simply… An institutional ad is not trackable, its purpose is merely to put a company name in front of the general public. A direct-response ad is trackable — it asks the reader to respond in some way (by phone, by website form, by mail, by coupon) — so you can measure the effectiveness of the ad.

Here’s an example of an institutional ad. It’s a full page ad I found in the Robb Report Magazine.

Even though this ad includes an address and phone numbers I still consider this ineffectual advertising because it really doesn’t solicit a direct response. Also, if someone calls or visits how do they know that visit or call was stimulated by this particular ad? It’s not trackable.

The rate card as posted on the Robb Report’s website shows that a full page ad, just like the one above, costs $31,896 for a one time run. Wasteful? In our example above, yes indeed! Now imagine if they reworked that ad to be a direct response ad it could have a dramatic effect on their business.

Direct-response advertising will help prevent you from blindly throwing money into the coffers of the radio and TV stations, and the newspapers and magazines, because you can measure whether or not your ad is effective.

Here’s an ad that is a direct response ad.

This ad has a good compelling USP which is; “A Sunsetter makes your life outdoors more enjoyable by keeping your deck up to 20 degrees cooler”. It has a phone number to call and if you noticed there’s a “tracking code” under the number, #PA019260. Now this ad isn’t perfect because there’s things that could be changed to make it more effective, but it’s much better than the Dubuis ad we looked at above.

Until a company understands the purpose of an ad and how to construct and formulate it, I advise my clients to hold off and stop throwing their money away. We’ll look at how to formulate an awesome, highly effective direct-response ad in a future post.

About the Author

Allen Crawleyis a business marketing and growth expert certified in the Hidden Marketing Assets System, a direct response copywriter, author, speaker, and consultant. Visit his blog and signup free to get your Free Report on how to Double Your Business in 90 Days. When you signup you'll also get his newletter by email packed with business growth strategies, marketing ideas, the latest news, free advice, additional resources, and a lot more! Go now to http://www.AllenCrawley.com.View all posts by Allen Crawley →

  • http://twitter.com/tshombe tshombe

    Allen, this is such an important article because business owners and sales peeps often think that traditional ads get them customers.  The criteria you enumerate for making an ad effective is a perfect checklist to follow when planning & creating ads.  Of course, it’s just as important where your ad appears as it is to actually elicit a response.

    I know you mention that the example you give of a direct response ad is not perfect, but I would offer that it’s little better than the first example (though likely considerably less expensive).

    It’s basically a typical Yellow Page display ad.  The only call-to-action is for the potential lead to see more images on their website.  The rest of the ad is about how great they are, and really gives no compelling reason for a person to contact them.

    The tracking number is good, provided they have some way they are able to obtain the number from the lead (but then again, they don’t even directly tell the person to call) or it’s somehow automatically linked to either/both the phone number or/and the URL where the photo library resides.

  • http://twitter.com/womenforaction Julene AllenDellAmor

    Companies whose products are already in the local stores can effectively get away with the institutional ads. The more the consumer sees a product, the more he or she is likely to purchase the product off the shelf or stop by the local chain to buy. It does not make sense for a small business to spend money on ads that consumers can not respond to.

  • Leif

    I dig this read, but what about inbound marketing? It’s easy to say that ads included in an inbound strategy are direct response, but i feel dirty saying it Because it doesn’t fit the definition. For instance, your tweet was an inbound ad. You got me to click through and check out your article because It’s beneficial to me as a marketer or small business owner. Insights? Thanks

    -I like reading Marketing blogs on the train

  • Pingback: Ineffective advertising: Harvest Fair « Greenwood Media Review